Prtexx wrote:You are correct, from my converstaion I gathered he is looking for info on what one would charge to build or detailed drawings on how to build. I am in the US and I would think $100 to $125 would be a fair price. As for detailed drawings it's really simple I use the gasket as the pattern and cut the flange out of 1/4 flat plate, cut the big hole with a holesaw on the drill press and drill the 4 holes to match. As for the tubing use a piece of 2.5" aluminized exh tubing bent as much as possible at any muffler shop then trim it with a chop saw until you are satified with the fit. No special equipment needed. (assuming you have a welder) if not just have your local shop weld it up once you have the parts made. On some models you will have to add nipples or a line to connect the vacuum from the TB to the intake for the IAC to work correcetly (2001 2.5 US)
You are perfectly correct! The idea is to produce an engineering print that says exactly what the dimensions of the piece are so that you can unroll it and say: "One of those" and there's no fussing over whether you were specific enough about the radius, or what diameter the bolt holes are and whether they are centered around the pipe. Just, "One of those."
To elaborate more on my 'grand diabolical plan': If parts that must be fabricated (like this) come to be standardized, this makes conversion more of a possibility for more Buses. Combine that with the ability to get either the stock or the labor from a local welder, it makes it possible for anyone to have one fabbed locally.
It is sort of like 3D printing in that respect: Someone in Darwin, Australia can design a widget and upload the file that tells a 3D printer how to make it. Users in LA, Tokyo, Cairo, or HERE (wherever 'here' is for you) can download that file, and if they have a 3D printer, fabricate the part. It still costs money (the ABS plastic isn't free. Neither is the printer. Or the time of fabricator, or the run-time on the machine.) But it is STANDARD and no matter where it is being printed it will be the same.
The same goes for distributing such an engineering doc. If you don't weld, you can have it made to spec. If you do weld, you can make it to spec and know it will fit. You can even work from standardized flanges and standardized piping sizes to speed or simplify the work. Less time for the fabricator to produce the same product to a higher quality of accuracy means more money for the fabricator. By offering the spec to anyone for free, more fabricators can get into the act and keep food on the table.
I know it is a little silly to suggest that such a small part and small job is some kind of tipping point for people in the fabrication biz. This is me dreaming out loud and starting small, with the goal that eventually we'll work up to a solution that anyone can do (if they have tools and skills) or can get as much local assistance as they need from local vendors to fill in the gaps that they can't do. Everyone benefits.
So, Prtexx: Many of the intakes I see have a cut halfway through the rotation where they've been rewelded. Yours doesn't. I presume that's because yours is being fabbed out of a single piece, like this:
http://www.jegs.com/i/Dynomax/289/42322/10002/-1?
I know the ceiling is lower on the earlier engine compartments, so the radius would have to be tight enough to fit in all potential situations. I also noticed that your last picture shows a pipe or bar that wraps around. What is that for?
Thanks again for your contributions.
Marshall