Type 1 vs. Type 4
-
MASSIVE TYPE IV
- Posts: 20132
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2000 12:01 am
Type 1 vs. Type 4
I could buy that...I have all the parts for a 2275 type 1, including JC Eliminator heads, and A Bugpack crank..
-
Chris
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2001 12:01 am
Type 1 vs. Type 4
Hey Darryl,
I can vouche for Jake's claim about the burnout. The Circle yer Wagens crew have a specially built stainless steel burnout pad - mainly for safety and to produce a lot of tire smoke. I know - I was there, along with AircoolBreeze, and several other friends from the Montgomery, AL area. There was no pool of water. True, the tires are wet to get them spinning. The car is "chocked" to keep it from rolling forward, and the wheels in the back spin on stainless steel with a steel pipe "border" built around the edges to keep the cars from going too far sideways. Anyways, it's fun - and it's the type 4 powered cars that do the best burnouts!
Chris Stanford
Montgomery, AL
I can vouche for Jake's claim about the burnout. The Circle yer Wagens crew have a specially built stainless steel burnout pad - mainly for safety and to produce a lot of tire smoke. I know - I was there, along with AircoolBreeze, and several other friends from the Montgomery, AL area. There was no pool of water. True, the tires are wet to get them spinning. The car is "chocked" to keep it from rolling forward, and the wheels in the back spin on stainless steel with a steel pipe "border" built around the edges to keep the cars from going too far sideways. Anyways, it's fun - and it's the type 4 powered cars that do the best burnouts!
Chris Stanford
Montgomery, AL
-
Darryl
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 1:01 am
Type 1 vs. Type 4
Jake, Jake, Jake.
I explained my position and said I "WISHED" I could you fool. As for mature posts....have you read what you typed? I can't understand you.
I see in the picture on your website, the van is indeed above an obvious puddle of some sort wether it be water or shiney pavement...it was deffinately the aid. I was pointing out facts, not bashing.
Just when I thought you could be civil and "mature" you prove me wrong..AGAIN>
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
[This message has been edited by Darryl (edited 06-02-2001).]
[This message has been edited by Cpt Zoomy (edited 06-02-2001).]
I explained my position and said I "WISHED" I could you fool. As for mature posts....have you read what you typed? I can't understand you.
I see in the picture on your website, the van is indeed above an obvious puddle of some sort wether it be water or shiney pavement...it was deffinately the aid. I was pointing out facts, not bashing.
Just when I thought you could be civil and "mature" you prove me wrong..AGAIN>
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
[This message has been edited by Darryl (edited 06-02-2001).]
[This message has been edited by Cpt Zoomy (edited 06-02-2001).]