Type 4 stub axels
- Piledriver
- Moderator
- Posts: 22878
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am
My bad, but when split between 4 CVs , it doesn't matter.
(Which is what I should have said in the first place...it works fine.)
(Which is what I should have said in the first place...it works fine.)
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
- tuna
- Posts: 2531
- Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 12:01 am
Thanks Ray for seeing what I was seeing. I thought I was becoming moronic and seeing things that no one else would.
Yes, the T2 and T4 CVs are different, but they are interchangible when using them in a conversion. Someone in the offroad forum could probably tell us what the difference is. I know they can tolerate a steeper angle than a Type 1 CV, but the difference between the two larger options, I don't know.
Tuna
Yes, the T2 and T4 CVs are different, but they are interchangible when using them in a conversion. Someone in the offroad forum could probably tell us what the difference is. I know they can tolerate a steeper angle than a Type 1 CV, but the difference between the two larger options, I don't know.
Tuna
- raygreenwood
- Posts: 11914
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 12:01 am
- Bobby74
- Posts: 1747
- Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2001 12:01 am
"Type 2 CV's have a maximum working angle of 18 degrees before the joint will "bind" or "pop out" under load. When running at stock height or about 1 inch below, Type 4 CV Joints will be required. Type 4 CV joints have a maximum working angle of 22 degrees."
This is quoted from the Bus-Boys website for IRS conversion on split window buses.
This is quoted from the Bus-Boys website for IRS conversion on split window buses.
- raygreenwood
- Posts: 11914
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 12:01 am
The reason why CV's with more internal clearance to the cages were needed for the 411/412...is that the rear uses a trailing wishbone, instead of the trailing arm/springplate. The stop for the limit of extension is the shock itself. That means that anytime you lift the rear off the ground, you get a good deal more travel than on a type or 3....or even a bus. So...it has a habit if denting the cages. It causes ugly wear. Ray