Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

User avatar
Dale M.
Posts: 1673
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 8:09 am

Re: Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

Post by Dale M. »

Piledriver wrote:
Dale M. wrote:Foriend of mine who put a Subaru motor in his fiberglass buggy, used micro-squirt and laments that it was to limited for tuning capabilities for him to get most out of his install.... He did not want to do a lot of mods and his "out of the box" unit is just not quite there for him, and he feels he would have better performance and tuning compatibilities with MS II....

And like most 2nd or 3rd generation "stuff" its more refined and more capable than the 1st generation...

Dale

What firmware was your buddy running?
uS supports the latest Ms2-extra FW //TunerStudio etc.

It's a pretty capable system these days, and IIRC the original uS setups had at least a couple add-on modules available.
(sequential IIRC, perhaps some more outputs)

It does have its limits though.
OTOH a 10+ year old v1.01 mainboard from the original group buy will still work fine with a MS3/MS3X, given a case transplant and some endplate work. (just not "supported", all the docs are written with V3 mainboards in mind, and they ARE better boards)
I don't know and didn't ask.... IT was just a offhand comment made one day at Auto-X event when we were chasing a fuel delivery problem (plugged fuel line)....

Dale
"Fear The Government That Wants To Take Your Guns" - Thomas Jefferson
1970 "Kellison Sand Piper Roadster"
User avatar
sideshow
Posts: 3428
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:00 am

Re: Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

Post by sideshow »

Ok, lets narrow the confusion;
MS-2 PCB3.57 http://www.diyautotune.com/catalog/mega ... p-171.html 444$ no loom
Micro-S http://www.diyautotune.com/catalog/micr ... p-131.html 339$ with loom

Both main boards are what I want in that they are SMC, and I plan zero add on solder. I'll use uninteresting injectors, not interest in installing a cam sensor. I don't feel that the brain cost is a big deal, all the hardware needed is going to exceed 1k no matter what path I take.

I'm still harping on the form factor of the parallel port connector as stupid. It might make sense if you don't drive outside, have a hermetically sealed cabin and are trailer-ed to locations.

This is what confuses me, micro-S is both cheaper with a proper form factor, and yet looks like the unwanted step child. There must be a reason for this.
Yeah some may call it overkill, but you can't have too much overkill.
Steve Arndt
Posts: 7420
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2001 12:01 am

Re: Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

Post by Steve Arndt »

Ray Greenwood has been mentioning the parallel port d-sub connector on here for 10 years. They are finicky in an office environment!
User avatar
sideshow
Posts: 3428
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:00 am

Re: Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

Post by sideshow »

I knew I wasn't the only person to notice that a printer isn't expected to be reusable once it hits freeway speeds.
Yeah some may call it overkill, but you can't have too much overkill.
User avatar
Piledriver
Moderator
Posts: 22764
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am

Re: Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

Post by Piledriver »

The only downside of uS is that it is what it is, with little>no expansion capability short of an IOX over CAN.
(IOX and children are admittedly pretty formidable beasts, but it isn't going to run sequential injectors or COPs if that is what you want to play with)

I'm probably cursing myself, but I have yet to have any connectivity issues with the DB connectors, nor do they appear remotely common.

I would prefer AMPSEAL, and if I really cared enough I could DIY, but in onsies they are insane $.

When they come out with a AMPSEALed/sealed MS3 based uS (all in one MS3/MS3X alike) I'll buy one.
(there is no "if", it's "when" IMHO)
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
User avatar
sideshow
Posts: 3428
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:00 am

Re: Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

Post by sideshow »

But G, you don't drive like I do and this one of many reasons I am unwilling to re solder something middle stream.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Yeah some may call it overkill, but you can't have too much overkill.
User avatar
Piledriver
Moderator
Posts: 22764
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am

Re: Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

Post by Piledriver »

Those ambulance style ceiling mounted consoles might be a good place for it.

"sealed" is great, but I don't recall seeing a depth spec :lol:
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
Steve Arndt
Posts: 7420
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2001 12:01 am

Re: Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

Post by Steve Arndt »

The big "cost" in some of these ECUs is the connectors. My Redline / 034 2C ECU has TWO (that is right, TWO) of the expensive connectors built in. All high currents on one connector at one of the ECU, and inputs on the other end. . It is one of the main changes from their base 1C to the 2C, the extra connector and layout. It works perfect, the AMPseal connectors are bomb proof for sure.

s
Steve Arndt
Posts: 7420
Joined: Sat Mar 10, 2001 12:01 am

Re: Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

Post by Steve Arndt »

sideshow wrote:But G, you don't drive like I do and this one of many reasons I am unwilling to re solder something middle stream.

Word.

s

edit;
That is cow piss, and Round-Up run off, not water. Very conductive and corrosive!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
sideshow
Posts: 3428
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:00 am

Re: Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

Post by sideshow »

I do like what I have seen with redline/043 as limited as it has been.

The lack of a high current fuel circuit or for that matter high current anything is a draw back to micro-s. But at the same time how much is a reliable connector and hardened enclosure that costs less, worth?
Yeah some may call it overkill, but you can't have too much overkill.
User avatar
Piledriver
Moderator
Posts: 22764
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am

Re: Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

Post by Piledriver »

sideshow wrote:I do like what I have seen with redline/043 as limited as it has been.

The lack of a high current fuel circuit or for that matter high current anything is a draw back to micro-s. But at the same time how much is a reliable connector and hardened enclosure that costs less, worth?
That's going to depend on the application.

For off road etc, sealed/all SMD etc is a huge bonus, and would take priority, or be a higher priority than the last 2 HP or MPG. OTOH cost/benefit comes into play.

OTOH any EFI at ALL is going to have more potential issues, for example ...when getting fuel etc from highly questionable sources during a race or in Podunk. Flushing/blowing out carbs is relatively straightforward.(except dual Webers in a full bodied bug, unless you are a tiny contortionist)
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
User avatar
MarioVelotta
Posts: 4086
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 12:01 am

Re: Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

Post by MarioVelotta »

If it makes you feel any better I am working on a plug and play Microsquirt kit with the Mexican system. It's been slow going with all my other jobs but it should be a great asset to my lineup.
Hall dizzy or crank trigger, Wasted spark IGN4, My COP's or wasted LS2 CNPs, idle valve. It's gonna be cool.

Image

Image

I may even use the hall dizzy in conjunction with the factory coil and wires from simplicity

Image

I even got new factory Mexican air filters :wink:

Image

I should have the rest of the parts I need an a week or so to get some more work done on it.
The Dub Shop
[email protected]
1600 ITB NA - 18sec
1600 Supercharged - 13psi - 15.40 @ 84.66mph
1600 Turbo - 185hp 250tq!! Going for 200
2276 Turbo - 15psi - 11.537 @ 115.74mph
Facebook-Tech-Store
User avatar
MarioVelotta
Posts: 4086
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 12:01 am

Re: Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

Post by MarioVelotta »

Piledriver wrote:When they come out with a AMPSEALed/sealed MS3 based uS (all in one MS3/MS3X alike) I'll buy one.
(there is no "if", it's "when" IMHO)
How much would you pay for that option? MS3 + Expander on a V3.57 with ampseal connector like Microsquirt? Because I know it's not going to be cheap.
The Dub Shop
[email protected]
1600 ITB NA - 18sec
1600 Supercharged - 13psi - 15.40 @ 84.66mph
1600 Turbo - 185hp 250tq!! Going for 200
2276 Turbo - 15psi - 11.537 @ 115.74mph
Facebook-Tech-Store
vwgillybilly
Posts: 182
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 4:55 am

Re: Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

Post by vwgillybilly »

MarioVelotta wrote:If it makes you feel any better I am working on a plug and play Microsquirt kit with the Mexican system. It's been slow going with all my other jobs but it should be a great asset to my lineup.
Hall dizzy or crank trigger, Wasted spark IGN4, My COP's or wasted LS2 CNPs, idle valve. It's gonna be cool.

Image

Image

I may even use the hall dizzy in conjunction with the factory coil and wires from simplicity

Image

I even got new factory Mexican air filters :wink:

Image

I should have the rest of the parts I need an a week or so to get some more work done on it.

That will be awesome!

Gill.
User avatar
sideshow
Posts: 3428
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2003 11:00 am

Re: Why is microsquirt not the default MS install?

Post by sideshow »

MarioVelotta wrote:If it makes you feel any better I am working on a plug and play Microsquirt kit with the Mexican system....
Image
That does make me feel better, as in that is the first time I have seen a micro-S in mockup. Are you doing the usual relay board to retro fit a not originally FI base vehicle?
Yeah some may call it overkill, but you can't have too much overkill.
Post Reply