Page 9 of 16
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:01 am
by davek9
aha, that sounds very interesting! so perhaps this would work:
get a T4 crank with T1 rod journals
flip one T1 connecting rod for each cylinder bank (3mm offset flipped = 6mm total change from center, right?)
make adapter plates to match the new bore spacing, which would be equal to 911 (one bore would remain in the same spot, the other would move in 6mm).
bolt up 911 heads and cam towers w/o modification (other than removing unused tower).
this sounds great and totally doable, which makes me think I'm probably missing something, but I'm encouraged. I think this could be a really fun project.
thanks for the additional feedback guys,
dave
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:29 am
by Frallan
Check carefully on Russ Collins camtowers. He only plugged the holes were the head would have been on a 911.
In this way you save the "hassle" to manufacture camshaft bearing extensions like we did.
I think mine look cool but it is an unnecessary extra item.
If you then manage to copy his way of cutting and indexing an original cam, there you go and save a lot of money and question marks.
I really would like to hear how it was done practically and even better, see pictures.
If someone told he would do it, I would just say "good luck" and give him 0 or little chance to work BUT Russ did it and he proved it by not only racing but also driving a lot on the street, for years.
So, it seems to be feasible.
Bobtail, you couldn“t pull some strings and get more details?
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:43 pm
by Type 4 Unleashed
Here is an issue that should be looked at, when they weld up a Type 4 jrl crank which has a jrl width of about 1.020" then
cut it it for the Type 1 width of about .890", in the picture of this crank that this was done, the jrls may be already offset some possibly around 3mm each.
The sides were the weld was left to take of the jrl width is opposite the mains which feed the rod jrls, and to keep the oil hole centered in the rod bearing

Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:19 pm
by davek9
I've deleted a rambling post of mine here, as I was confusing even myself. I'll come back to this in the morning.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 9:29 pm
by Frallan
Tip:
Carillo or Pauter will make you a rod with any offset you wish.
I saw the prices of Pauter recently and was positively suprised. It is a quality rod with possibility of custom measurements.
Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2008 6:10 am
by M-Owen
Frallen I was thinking the same thing, Dave I am currently work a simular Idea I am using plates ( thickness undetermined as of yet ) with the 118 bore spacing. I am however thinking it would be better to offset the small end by 3mm on type 4 66mm rods. I was a little worried about welding the crank and the difference in length of the Type 1 rod is 10mm over the 1.8 rod. Since I plan on using stock 911 pistons and cylinders I am assuming that the rod lenth will matter.
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:15 am
by M-Owen
Type 4 Unleashed wrote:Here is an issue that should be looked at, when they weld up a Type 4 jrl crank which has a jrl width of about 1.020" then
cut it it for the Type 1 width of about .890", in the picture of this crank that this was done, the jrls may be already offset some possibly around 3mm each.
The sides were the weld was left to take of the jrl width is opposite the mains which feed the rod jrls, and to keep the oil hole centered in the rod bearing

Who completed the work on the crankshaft shown in the picture? One of the problems here is trying to get a machine shop to understand what you are asking them for. The more I read these last few posts the more it's making sense.
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:47 pm
by Type 4 Unleashed
This crank was done over 15 years or more ago, and more than likely was done in Germany, but no markings to say by who.
There are machine shops, then there are machine shops that all they do are cranks, and would have a better understanding of what you want.
One thing you have to consider is the stroke (66mm) & rod (5.0") which gives a rod to stroke ratio of 1.92 to 1. I don't remember the pin heigth of a 1.7 or 1.8 piston but that needs to be compared to the 6 pistons you are planning to use. and any rod length over 5.160" will give well over 2.0 to 1 rod to stroke ratio.
The problem I am getting at, is the thickness ? of the plate that you want to use to use the 6 cyl's bore spacing, it will have to be thick enough to be able to screw cyl studs into, and your rods will be too short, to be able to get any deck heigth.
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 2:26 pm
by M-Owen
I found a shop called Demello Crankshaft, I spoke to the owner and he seems very knowledgeable about the subject and can counterweight the crankshaft as well. I would welcome any feedback about this shop if anyone has used them. AS far as the rod length is concerned, I was thinking that the deck height could be milled accordingly I would like to try and use the type 1 rod as was suggested in an earlier thread. I do admit there will be a little math involved, I will post my findings as soon as I can
Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 4:40 pm
by Piledriver
Interesting finding...The aftermarket T1 Hbeam rods aren't offset, which kinda makes me wonder if a little offset really matters...
(The stock one are offset, as are the CB Ibeams I have at least)
DPR and Demello are the only places to go for the crank.
google dpr machine...
Jake swears by DPR, if you buy one through the Type4store it's a DPR with Jakes specs.
Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2008 5:29 am
by M-Owen
Does anyone know the case spigot dimension for a stock Type 4? I am on the road and can't measure the one I have.
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 4:53 am
by M-Owen
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:02 am
by M-Owen
I wish I understood how to post a picture the right way
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:04 am
by Frallan
I am quite sure you just need to unclick Disable BBcode in this post.
Try it.
Frallan
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 6:25 am
by Wally
M-Owen wrote: