spongeworthy wrote:Apparently just having a signature stating your support for a particular candidate is considered the same as a discussion of politics.
Somebody actually hacked my profile and deleted my signature. That's really going a little too far.
Nobody hacked, a wrong was made right. A signature supporting a political candidate is political. No politics means just that, kinda like a Stop sign means STOP, does not require interpretation If you have a further complaint please PM myself or Doc.
I would also recommend adding religion to the censorship list. That's a topic that can lead to far more arguments than any mention of a candidate would.
This is a common sense thing if somebody is screwing up please ask them to fix it. I am going to let this go into the general threads. Hopefully it will not have to be brought back up. Thanks!
I agree with Mr. Worthy. I hate to see censorship but religion and politcs don't belong here. Too easy to lose friends without haveing those topics driving it.
Lee
My opinion is worth slightly less than what you paid for it.
Kix wrote:Soooooo........ I shouldnt post that video of the Vatican bishops voting over who the new Pope should be while in a sauna?
Yeah that might not be a good idea. Probably end up in time out with Lotrat, but you see how well that works.
petew wrote:what prompted restating the rules? if you don't mind me asking...
Oh heck no, ask away. Rules have not changed in awhile though we have been pushing the limits. I don't want a lot of rules we should self police ourselves.
Hot, humid air is less dense than cooler, drier air. This can allow a golf ball to fly through the air with greater ease, as there won't be as much resistance on the ball.
This posting of rules is really starting to piss me off! 
