So...you wanna go turbo?

Offroad VW based vehicles have problems/insights all their own. Not to mention the knowledge gained in VW durability.
User avatar
Leatherneck
Moderator
Posts: 17104
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 6:47 pm

Post by Leatherneck »

Tuff to answer your question, NO! so sorry so late (ya have to say that with a oriental accent)
User avatar
RyanB
Posts: 1466
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:01 am

Post by RyanB »

I'd like to point out however that without someone with different understanding jumping in, then further discussions that we all benefit from to improve our own understandings would not happen.

Sure it may sound like someone is nitpicking or trying to prove thier point, but that's because they have a different view. In the end, everyone see's the information and can then make an educated decision based on the discussion.

/end soapbox


btw, this really is an awesome thread. I've thought about turbo in the past long enough to realize I didnt have a clue and wouldnt consider even attempting it. With this thead, i'd at least entertain the idea now of doing it sometime in the future. Great info!!
User avatar
Leatherneck
Moderator
Posts: 17104
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 6:47 pm

Post by Leatherneck »

Yea Turbo is black magic, if it was not for Scott I would be banging around with my 1775, but man I want to get my front end off the ground! :lol:

This has been a helpful thread, keep the questions going guys, don't consider anything stupid or dumb.
User avatar
ChadRat
Posts: 590
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 1:07 pm

Post by ChadRat »

Leatherneck wrote:Yea Turbo is black magic, if it was not for Scott I would be banging around with my 1775, but man I want to get my front end off the ground! :lol:
you need to put your front end on a diet. :D
User avatar
Big Dave
Posts: 3208
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 4:31 pm

Post by Big Dave »

Scott, what are your feelings on this? Could you make up something similiar?
http://www.cbperformance.com/catalog.asp?ProductID=287

I have been eyeing it for a couple years. I really want to go with FI. I am tired of pluging idle jets and having the car blubber its way over big rocks and steep hills.
Baja5's car has the CB FI and on a cold morning in the desert, it took me several minutes to get my car warmed up to where i could let it idle. He turned the key and walked away. The FI system alone goes for about $1800, so the turbo setup would only cost an additional 1400 to have the best of both worlds.
I don't always show my signature. But when I do, it's in this area.
User avatar
scott the viking
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 8:35 am

Post by scott the viking »

That is a pretty good kit. I have made quite a number of FI turbo kits...They all run in the same ballpark price of what the CB kit costs. Most of the time I personally will take a slightly different approach than CB does. I have no problem with what they do...other than the kit is set up like two 48mm carbs. So you do have to get them synchronized just like carbs. I use a center mounted throttle body like the one found on a FI 5.0 ford or a suby.
User avatar
Big Dave
Posts: 3208
Joined: Tue May 17, 2005 4:31 pm

Post by Big Dave »

For a system like that with the bigger injectors and T04 on a 2110, what size fuel/return lines are necessary?
I ask because I'll be cutting into the pan head soon, and that would be the time to run a larer aluminum fuel line(s).
I don't always show my signature. But when I do, it's in this area.
User avatar
david58
Moderator
Posts: 14101
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 6:14 pm

Post by david58 »

Big Dave wrote:For a system like that with the bigger injectors and T04 on a 2110, what size fuel/return lines are necessary?
I ask because I'll be cutting into the pan head soon, and that would be the time to run a larer aluminum fuel line(s).
To add to Dave's question. Where should the return line be in the tank? If it is in the top seems it would make air bubbles that would not be wanted. On FI in tank pumps the return exit is at the bottom of the pickup of the pump.
Hot, humid air is less dense than cooler, drier air. This can allow a golf ball to fly through the air with greater ease, as there won't be as much resistance on the ball.
User avatar
scott the viking
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 8:35 am

Post by scott the viking »

5/16 is more than enough and I run the return into the bottom of the tank.
User avatar
scott the viking
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 8:35 am

Post by scott the viking »

Many guys will put a T fitting on their existing tank outlet, so the return is going to the same spot as the feed. But it has to be made large enough to handle it. It's kind of a weird set-up if you stop and think about it. But it does work
User avatar
scott the viking
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 8:35 am

Post by scott the viking »

What were their problems?
I should throw in that I personally don't run a line back to the fuel tank, I use a surge tank on all my Fuel injected stuff and just run the return line back to it.
It's just that I run with a bunch of guys returning it to the tank with a T and none of them are having any trouble. I have always said that they "should" be having trouble...but...when they spend the whole day driving around next to me...I guess that "should" kind of flies out the window.
DesertGuy
Posts: 2303
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 7:45 pm

Post by DesertGuy »

scott the viking wrote:I use a surge tank on all my Fuel injected stuff and just run the return line back to it.
Does the surge need to be vented to offset the return pressure, or is it simply offset by backing up the main feed into the tank?

Are electrical FI pumps positive displacement? Or is the return more for the residual pressure than volume?

Finally, if turbo is a great item for the sand, is it beneficial for a desert based car?
User avatar
scott the viking
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 8:35 am

Post by scott the viking »

Yeah...I could see a need for the use of a low pressure pump if you have a surge tank that looks nice. Because you would mount it where it could be seen (in the engine compartment). On a rail or bug, there is almost always room under the fuel tank for a small surge tank, so it's just gravity fed and hidden from view. Most of the time I just make one out of 2 1/2 inch stainless tubing and weld end caps on it. I considered going to FI many times on my Bronco...but it was a Stroppe, So I left it alone as much as I could.
User avatar
scott the viking
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2004 8:35 am

Post by scott the viking »

DesertGuy wrote:
scott the viking wrote:I use a surge tank on all my Fuel injected stuff and just run the return line back to it.
Does the surge need to be vented to offset the return pressure, or is it simply offset by backing up the main feed into the tank?

Are electrical FI pumps positive displacement? Or is the return more for the residual pressure than volume?

Finally, if turbo is a great item for the sand, is it beneficial for a desert based car?
The extra pressure just goes back to the tank.

The return is for the pressure, for cooling of the fuel and for extending the life of the pump. Nearly all FI pumps are positive displacement.

Turbo in the desert? While the power would be much better and even usable in the desert terrain....I would say that it is more of a personal choice kind of an item. IE...a turbo does add more moving parts to your vehicle and does build a little more heat. I personally would run one and keep the boost on the low side of things. Lots of turbo charged cars in the Dakar rally (and that's saying something). I can tell you this....I would NOT go the cheap route when installing a turbo on a desert car...I would have one custom built with all the right goodies.
User avatar
Kraut_n_Rice
Posts: 638
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 4:25 pm

Post by Kraut_n_Rice »

That 3.2 is already near your 091's limits, there DG. The only reason I was thinking about it was sand is supposed to be easier on a car in compairison to desert. You could try this gem, should bolt right up. :wink:
'68 Baja project. FOR SALE
Post Reply