early bus -> bay front beam swap?

The quintessential people and stuff mover.
wingman
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 12:01 am

early bus -> bay front beam swap?

Post by wingman »

Does anyone know whether 70 bus front beam (wide 5 wheels) can be bolt onto 63 bus?

Thanks,
Michael
User avatar
Marc
Moderator
Posts: 23741
Joined: Thu May 23, 2002 12:01 am

Post by Marc »

bugmandan
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2003 9:20 pm

Post by bugmandan »

Baywindow busses had two different bolt patterns where they mounted to the frame. I bolted a 68' beam in my 58' Bus. I don't know what year they changed, but the distance between the top and bot. holes got farther apart. Good luck.
FlatFourFanatic
Posts: 92
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2001 12:01 am

Post by FlatFourFanatic »

General consensus seems to be that only 68 buses came with a beam with the early bolt pattern,thus enabling fitting into a split bus. However I have found these early beams in 69 and 70 buses.All down to chassis no I guess.
Kiwi_66
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 2:44 pm

Post by Kiwi_66 »

Just check to see if the beam bolt patterns are the same for bolting to the chassis of your split. I had a beam out of a '70 bus that still had the right bolt pattern to fit in my splitty.
User avatar
pyrOman
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 10:18 am

Post by pyrOman »

I have a late fatchick beam on my '65 with disc brakes. Granted I did have to modify the beam a bit but the top bolts lined up and I put an inch weld at the bottom end of it in leiu of bolts. For the wide five pattern I got adapters from Wolfgang.

I used the late beam because that's what I got for free! However, with time, the right resources, and of course MONEY, the correct way to do it is to get the early fatchick beam to bolt on your split, then get the disc brake spindles and adapers.

Don't forget to get a dual circuit master cylinder if you go with the disc barkes, it is vital to do that!
biggraham
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2002 12:01 am

Post by biggraham »

A 68/69 beam willbolt right in BUT:

It raises your front end about 3 inches

It increases your track

How safe are adapters?
User avatar
pyrOman
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 10:18 am

Post by pyrOman »

Safe? I dunno! But I can easily cruise at 80mph :P

The Wolfgang adapters I got are made of half inch steel plate. Had them for about 7 years now, no problems at all even when driving through 40 miles of washboard down in Baja :shock: I highly recomend them. At the time they only cost $50 a pair, may be a bit more now but still worth it, IMHO!

I also did my "shade tree" mechanic trick to lower the front by 2"... pmail for det.
User avatar
teacherguy
Posts: 83
Joined: Sun Apr 07, 2002 12:01 am

Post by teacherguy »

Piggybacking on this conversation, what year did the bays start coming with discs? I would love to swap fronts from a bay into my '66 to get the discs and ball joints. However, I would hate to lose the wide fives and the empi look-alike 5spokes that are currently installed. I guess I could go with adapters, but would like to see what other options are out there. Thanks in advance for any help.

Chance
User avatar
dickcharlton
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 9:49 pm

Post by dickcharlton »

I know my 72 has discs. I think they started in 71 but not positive.
germansupplyscott
Posts: 887
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2001 12:01 am

Post by germansupplyscott »

disc brakes on the front and narrow 5 bolt patter wheels started in 71.
justdubbin
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2002 12:01 am

Post by justdubbin »

teacherguy
Piggybacking on this conversation, what year did the bays start coming with discs? I would love to swap fronts from a bay into my '66 to get the discs and ball joints. However, I would hate to lose the wide fives and the empi look-alike 5spokes that are currently installed. I guess I could go with adapters, but would like to see what other options are out there.
I'm sure it was 71, both of the 71's I've had have discs but they are different to the 72 (read: rarer=more$$$) and they all have the small 5 stud.


Rob.
Post Reply