comp. ratio

Who is the best person to rebuild your engine? You...
scs65
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 12:01 am

comp. ratio

Post by scs65 »

needing some info. planning to buy a pair of 044 heads to fit on a 90.5 x 78.4 (2017). The dealer says the combustion chambers are approx. 55cc. I'm wanting a compression ratio of about 10.5:1. My math says i need a combustion chamber of about 41cc. How much needs to be flycut from the heads to reduce the chamber by 14 or 15 ccs.??
User avatar
Searoy
Posts: 2869
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2001 12:01 am

comp. ratio

Post by Searoy »

What deck height?

------------------
*** Teach a Man to Fish ***
Darth Searoy

"I tend to lean toward a tighter gap and a
looser skirt....a little slap never hurt." --
Joe Locicero a.k.a. Joe of the West
scs65
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 12:01 am

comp. ratio

Post by scs65 »

I'm assuming a deck of .070. Just going from memory of what the last piston/cylinder had. goigt to install same size and brand of jugs as previous. its been a year since I looked at this so memory might be a little fuzzy.
User avatar
Marc
Moderator
Posts: 23741
Joined: Thu May 23, 2002 12:01 am

comp. ratio

Post by Marc »

If it's an option you'd be better off reducing the deck to .050" and only cutting the heads down by 10cc.
The "rule of thumb" is that you'll need to cut .010" for every cc. It varies with the chamber shape of course, but that'll get you quite close on most heads.
scs65
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 12:01 am

comp. ratio

Post by scs65 »

I'd like to reduce the deck height but don't know any way to do it other than machining the case. dont want to get into that. theres no barrell spacers used. I'm trying to verify the deck height today. hoping thats its less than .070. .140 seems like a lot to flycut, but the 044s are supposed to have a much thicker combustion chamber casting. Anyone know about this?
User avatar
bedlamite
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2002 12:01 am

comp. ratio

Post by bedlamite »

What length rods are you using? If you're not willing to cut the cylinders, it may be better to bump the rod length to get the combustion out of the cylinder, especially with that high compression ratio.

Assuming you are using stock length rods and the deck height of .070 is correct, I would change to 5.5" rods, add .060" spacers, and cut the heads to 50cc. That should get your CR up to about 10.3

------------------
If you can make black marks from the apex of one turn to the braking point of the next, you may have enough horsepower.
scs65
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 12:01 am

comp. ratio

Post by scs65 »

well, actually, it looks like my deck height was .110. I assume the new setup will be about the same. The rods are stock length. Is cutting the cylinders to a shorter length a routine job? If so, thats a simple solution. I'd prefer a much smaller deck clearance and be able to leave the combuston chamber alone. I'm new to VWs and this board. It seems that compression ratios in the 8 to 1 range is common for the VWs. I'm racing on a dirt oval, is a 10 to 1 ratio going to hold up?
User avatar
James2
Posts: 3148
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2001 12:01 am

comp. ratio

Post by James2 »

Any machine shop can cut the cylinders. Chances are you may have have both the cylinder and head cut.

You can run the deck as close as .050 with no worries. Other, including me are running much tigher decks.

[This message has been edited by James2 (edited 01-27-2003).]
scs65
Posts: 32
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2003 12:01 am

comp. ratio

Post by scs65 »

yes, with my math, it looks like I'd have to get the combustion chamber down to 45 CCs even if I had .050 deck clearance to get the 10 1/2 to 1 ratio. Seems strange to increase displacement by 25% and still have to do machine work to get compression.
Post Reply