Shoptalkforums.com

For Your Air Cooled Pleasure!
It is currently Wed Oct 01, 2014 5:17 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: torsional leaf springs linear? / preloading arms myth!
PostPosted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 7:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2003 2:42 am
Posts: 955
are packs of torsional leaf spings linear, as in obey F = -k*x (or rather Torque=-k*theta)?

if they are... then this whole thing about pre-loading your front end by counter rotating your upper and torsion arms is BOOOGUS. you'll take the slop out if there was any, but you won't increase your spring rate AT ALL.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 5:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:37 am
Posts: 109
I've always thought that the more you preload the springs, the more you preload the bearings and every other place that causes friction. Friction equals stiffness?

I also mentioned this in an earlier thread, only real response I got was Ozzie's invitation for a beer...
http://www.shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=777255


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: torsional leaf springs linear? / preloading arms myth!
PostPosted: Sun Oct 21, 2007 8:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 3:01 am
Posts: 6522
gcorrado wrote:
are packs of torsional leaf spings linear, as in obey F = -k*x (or rather Torque=-k*theta)?

No they are not. A torsion bar is progressive. Meaning that the next degree of rotation requires much more force than the previous degree of rotation.
k is exponential.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: torsional leaf springs linear? / preloading arms myth!
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 4:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 1:33 pm
Posts: 24
Bruce2 wrote:
gcorrado wrote:
are packs of torsional leaf spings linear, as in obey F = -k*x (or rather Torque=-k*theta)?

No they are not. A torsion bar is progressive. Meaning that the next degree of rotation requires much more force than the previous degree of rotation.
k is exponential.


No. Solid torsion bars like the ones in our rear suspension are linear:

T = 0.5*theta*G*Pi*r^4/l

T - torque
Theta - angle(rad) of deflection
G - Shear modulus (80GPa for steel)
r - radius of torsion bar
l - lenght of torsion bar

I think kdf is on the right track about the friction thing... even though the friction is dampening it might give the feel of a stiffer suspension.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: torsional leaf springs linear? / preloading arms myth!
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2003 2:42 am
Posts: 955
Duus wrote:
Bruce2 wrote:
gcorrado wrote:
are packs of torsional leaf spings linear, as in obey F = -k*x (or rather Torque=-k*theta)?

No they are not. A torsion bar is progressive. Meaning that the next degree of rotation requires much more force than the previous degree of rotation. k is exponential.

No. Solid torsion bars like the ones in our rear suspension are linear:
T = 0.5*theta*G*Pi*r^4/l


Solid torsion bars are DEFINITELY linear, as Duus suggests. Sway-A-Way goes so far as to quote the spring rates for their rear torsion bars. http://www.swayaway.com/TechRoom_VWguides.php So, Bruce2, you're definitely off that "a torsion bar is progressive", but it still might be the case that packs of torsion leaves (which are not single solid bars obviously) are in fact progressive.

I know for fact that leaf strings used in carriage suspension ARE progressive - but in that case it comes from having many leaves of different lengths. The torsional arrangement might be totally different.

So if torsion leaf packs are like torsion bars, they're linear... if they're like like leaf spring stacks, they might be progressive

Duus wrote:
kdf wrote:
I've always thought that the more you preload the springs, the more you preload the bearings and every other place that causes friction. Friction equals stiffness?
I think kdf is on the right track about the friction thing... even though the friction is dampening it might give the feel of a stiffer suspension.


(1) I don't believe it.
(2) If it *is* true, it's a lame solution.

Re 1: The needle bearings in the torsion housing and the ball joints in the arms are *designed* to produce minimal friction under the load of the whole stinking car. The few dozen extra pound of force you could add by preloading would have a tiny effect on friction. If your bearing are SHOT, maybe, but then it's just going to be a creaky sticky mess.

Re 2: If you want more damping, put on stiffer shocks. Shocks are *designed* as dampers, do the job really well, and are available in a wide variety of stiffnesses. If you could overload the bearings so much that you were seeing significantly more friction at the bearings, you'd just be wearing out your bearings and your springs - asking them to do a job they were never intended to do.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 5:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 26, 2006 3:16 pm
Posts: 518
Location: Secession Oaks, South Carolina
Beer invite still stands. :D
I don't know what the phisics book says about the stack of leaf springs. What I do know is that the more you pre-load one against the other, the stiffer the front end gets. Plenty enough to feel the difference.
Your results may vary (but I doubt by very much).
If you are studying it worms eye, don't forget that not only are you twisting the spring, you are wrapping them around each other helix style. The more you twist, the more it wants to shrink in both diameter and length. It can't shrink, it's solid.

_________________
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
Ben Franklin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 7:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2003 2:42 am
Posts: 955
ozzie wrote:
What I do know is that the more you pre-load one against the other, the stiffer the front end gets. Plenty enough to feel the difference.


hmmm... well maybe the leaf sets really are progressive...

ozzie wrote:
not only are you twisting the spring, you are wrapping them around each other helix style. The more you twist, the more it wants to shrink in both diameter and length. It can't shrink, it's solid.


a plausible explaination for how they achieve a progressive spring rate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 7:37 am
Posts: 109
ozzie wrote:
Beer invite still stands. :D

If you are studying it worms eye, don't forget that not only are you twisting the spring, you are wrapping them around each other helix style. The more you twist, the more it wants to shrink in both diameter and length. It can't shrink, it's solid.


This same happens in a regular torsion bar too. Tiny steel molecules being wrapped around each other in helix style.

So the beer invitation made everyone silent again...

I'm still betting on friction.
Testing this is quite high on my big list of what to do when I really get the spare time and inspiration to do it, which is probably never.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group