Twin plug heads.
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 10:01 am
Twin plug heads.
OK
I was reading Motorcycle News ( UK motorcycle magazine ) today - a brief tech article on twin plug heads. They said that with high revs BMW and Suzuki delayed ignition on the second plug so the second plug did not fire. The view is that with large bores twin plug systems are only useful at low revs.
Comments ?
I was reading Motorcycle News ( UK motorcycle magazine ) today - a brief tech article on twin plug heads. They said that with high revs BMW and Suzuki delayed ignition on the second plug so the second plug did not fire. The view is that with large bores twin plug systems are only useful at low revs.
Comments ?
- Wally
- Posts: 4563
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 12:01 am
Limbach (VW aircraft engines) had these developed also, but already long time ago. I had a set. Reasons were safety-regulations made them necessary for aircraft application, they were not developed solely because of performance reasons, tho it can never hurt to have it.76bug wrote:stan pobjoy in australia has developed twin plug heads for the type1 vw head, he runs them on 1916's. alot more low down torque
Porsche reseached that as from a 100mm bore onwards, they were a noticeble benefit for street engines, hence twin plugs on later 993 3,6 engines with the 100mm bore.
Although some 356 carrera (race) engines with small bores also used twin plugs...
T4T: 2,4ltr Type 4 Turbo engine, 10.58 1/4 mi
www.apfelbeck.nl
"Mine isn't turbo'd to make a slow engine fast, but to make a fast engine insane" - Chip Birks
www.apfelbeck.nl
"Mine isn't turbo'd to make a slow engine fast, but to make a fast engine insane" - Chip Birks
-
- Posts: 20132
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2000 12:01 am
- Unkl Ian
- Posts: 872
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 12:01 am
Re: Twin plug heads.
The benefit of dual plugs is more noticable at lower engine speeds,mikeG15 wrote:OK
The view is that with large bores twin plug systems are only useful at low revs.
Comments ?
when flame travel is the slowest.
Flame speed increases with rpms,as will turbulence due to squish,
so the benefit at higher speeds would not be as drastic.
Of course,the shape of the combustion chamber and dome will influence to need for a second plug.
I'd love to do a set of heads with as many spark plugs as I could
possibly squeeze in there,and test different combinations.
- Piledriver
- Moderator
- Posts: 22520
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am
Most bikes don't have ~4" bores, and the ones that do aren't generally "high performance".
(Twin plugs in very radical Harleys is pretty common)
Perhaps they are reducing plug wear--- I imagine at 10K the second plug timing difference would be on the noise.
I believe a chap in India was using 6 plugs... per cylinder.(2 stroke IIRC)
Little hard to cool perhaps...
(Twin plugs in very radical Harleys is pretty common)
Perhaps they are reducing plug wear--- I imagine at 10K the second plug timing difference would be on the noise.
I believe a chap in India was using 6 plugs... per cylinder.(2 stroke IIRC)
Little hard to cool perhaps...
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 10:01 am
Combustion propagation rates should have no relationship to engine RPM
At low revs the mixture is denser than at high RPMs unless there is a very effective harmonic ram effect.
Therefore at low RPMs the flame front actually propagates faster.
Does this mean that at high revs ( as used in competition ) twin plug setups are un-necessary even with high compression ratios?
At low revs the mixture is denser than at high RPMs unless there is a very effective harmonic ram effect.
Therefore at low RPMs the flame front actually propagates faster.
Does this mean that at high revs ( as used in competition ) twin plug setups are un-necessary even with high compression ratios?
- Unkl Ian
- Posts: 872
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 12:01 am
There was a recent thread on the subject of flame speed
on the Speedtalk.com engines forum.
http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 132825e977
on the Speedtalk.com engines forum.
http://speedtalk.com/forum/viewtopic.ph ... 132825e977
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 10:01 am
Great link!!!
Your comment on number of spark plugs per cylinder reminded me of on of my own posts
http://www.shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic ... ed+circuit
Your comment on number of spark plugs per cylinder reminded me of on of my own posts
http://www.shoptalkforums.com/viewtopic ... ed+circuit
- raygreenwood
- Posts: 11895
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2003 12:01 am
The conversation concerning bisection of teh flame front is spot on. I was watching my brother build a custom engine for circle track a couple years back that had very advanced combustion chamber techniques. It had...as we would term it...."squishies"......which have been in use in teh V-8 racing world for quite some time. It was a 327 making in teh neighborhood of 500 hp @ about 13:1. The piston domes were near mirror replicas of the combustion chamber.
On teh dyno he found much better efficiency and power by literally cutting a "trough" through the dome of several mm deep to allow linkage of both sides of the combustion chambers which were cut off from each other as the piston approaches TDC. The flame front is split...and or the flame on teh side of teh dome opposite the plug was underignited (wasted fuel and power loss). Short of a second plug....this was one method of connecting the spaces that are full of fuel air mix and under compression. I beleive in the link in that discussion they may have been speaking about putting the trough in the head itself. Ray
On teh dyno he found much better efficiency and power by literally cutting a "trough" through the dome of several mm deep to allow linkage of both sides of the combustion chambers which were cut off from each other as the piston approaches TDC. The flame front is split...and or the flame on teh side of teh dome opposite the plug was underignited (wasted fuel and power loss). Short of a second plug....this was one method of connecting the spaces that are full of fuel air mix and under compression. I beleive in the link in that discussion they may have been speaking about putting the trough in the head itself. Ray