90.5 cly/pis
76mm crank
I don't want anything with too much juice as I am young and if i want power i'd like to go forced induction how whould this work out?
1956?
-
Air-Cooled Head
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2001 12:01 am
1956?
My question would be, why 1955?
Stepping the crank up to 78 or 78.4 gets you a more common 2007 or 2016. There is lots of info available for these combos, and lots of folks w/ experience w/ them. You just don't see 1955s much.
Since building costs would be about the same, why not get the most bang for the buck?
Stepping the crank up to 78 or 78.4 gets you a more common 2007 or 2016. There is lots of info available for these combos, and lots of folks w/ experience w/ them. You just don't see 1955s much.
Since building costs would be about the same, why not get the most bang for the buck?
-
Hi-C
- Posts: 262
- Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 1:01 am
1956?
i realy haven't started anything yet i kinda like to know my plan in its whole before i go.
the reason i'd like to go 1955 is it's different (if haveing a VW isn't different enough) i figured that the smaller crank would be pleanty strong if i went turbo and it would rev fairly quick the 78 probrbly does every thing i've said and i could copy someone else but what fun whould that be?
the reason i'd like to go 1955 is it's different (if haveing a VW isn't different enough) i figured that the smaller crank would be pleanty strong if i went turbo and it would rev fairly quick the 78 probrbly does every thing i've said and i could copy someone else but what fun whould that be?