1915?

Vee Dub Nut · Post by **Vee Dub Nut** » Mon Dec 02, 2002 5:13 pm

What is everyones opinion of 94mm pistons and cylinders? Is it worth the money? I have Mofoco 042 heads, Weber 34mm carbs, stock grind hydraulic cam, and a counterweight crank.
Any suggestions?
Adam

------------------
Dubbin Nutz!!!

James2 · Post by **James2** » Mon Dec 02, 2002 5:34 pm

Not worth it in case, unless you are going to upgrade the cam and carbs in the future.

You just don't have enough carb to feed the bigger motor. I would run either 88 or 90.5s

fish · Post by **fish** » Mon Dec 02, 2002 9:53 pm

no substitute for cubic centimeters. I have a couple completly stock (except for the 94mm p&l's) 1915 running around in AZ. Some in buses, some in bugs, and 1 in a ghia. I have no complaints by any of the customers. Not super fast but they have that extra when trying to pass on the highway. just my 2 cents.

------------------
TYPE 4's RULE
Dougs Buggs-N-Bunnies
Mesa AZ

MondoMan · Post by **MondoMan** » Mon Dec 02, 2002 10:04 pm

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by fish:
<B>\ Not super fast but they have that extra when trying to pass on the highway. just my 2 cents.

</B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Stock heads, kads, possibly E110, maybe cw crank don't know for sure yet, nothing fancy (a piece of sh*t if you ask Marc) yet I blew past people at 85 today and it wasn't even smoking! LOL...

------------------
The surgeon general never said anything about smoking V-8s

[This message has been edited by MondoMan (edited 12-02-2002).]