Pulley Options thick enough for Hall sensor magnets?

Fuel Supply & Ignition Systems
User avatar
slowsixtyduece
Posts: 676
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 12:01 am

Pulley Options thick enough for Hall sensor magnets?

Post by slowsixtyduece »

This may be a shot in the dark, but I'm wondering if anyone knows of a quality, stock sized pulley that has a thick enough "behind the fan belt" back section to drill a 1/8" dia hole about 3-4mm deep? Please see attached pic for an example of what I'm looking for (found on here).

This is for an SDS Hall sensor magnet. My current Berg achiever pulley is questionable. My calculations show that I would only have 1-2mm before there's a magnet protruding into the fan belt :?

Thanks!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Piledriver
Moderator
Posts: 22520
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am

Re: Pulley Options thick enough for Hall sensor magnets?

Post by Piledriver »

What "wheel pattern" does the SDS need? Just TDC?
There are several off the shelf hall sensor setups available, like Marios' hidden setup.

You don't need a magnet to run most hall automotive sensors, the magnet is usually in the sensor, just need to pass some steel by it, a (not stainless steel) setscrew or sawn off bolt will work.
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
User avatar
slowsixtyduece
Posts: 676
Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2002 12:01 am

Re: Pulley Options thick enough for Hall sensor magnets?

Post by slowsixtyduece »

Piledriver wrote:What "wheel pattern" does the SDS need? Just TDC?
There are several off the shelf hall sensor setups available, like Marios' hidden setup.

You don't need a magnet to run most hall automotive sensors, the magnet is usually in the sensor, just need to pass some steel by it, a (not stainless steel) setscrew or sawn off bolt will work.
The wheel pattern is simply one magnet wherever you happen to locate the hall sensor (the pulley is then clocked to TDC) and another magnet 180* out from wherever the first magnet was placed. The SDS unit uses a Hall sensor- I dont know if the SDS EFI hall sensor works differently than the average pickup. Do you know?


I was looking at Marios- really nice stuff. However, I dont know if it will work. Maybe some sort of conversion would work?

Here is a link to how SDS does their Hall Sensor:
http://www.sdsefi.com/em4e17.pdf
User avatar
Piledriver
Moderator
Posts: 22520
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am

Re: Pulley Options thick enough for Hall sensor magnets?

Post by Piledriver »

All hall sensors I have ever dealt with act as a switching ground, but some are normally open, some normally closed.

Generally, they pull a signal line pulled up to 5v or 12 via a resistor in the ecu to ground to provide a signal.
You can see how yours works with a multimeter when connected to the ECU.

I built my own using an off the shelf Allegro ATS667 sensor and a couple SMD resistors and caps, stuffs in a 3/8" SS tube about an inch long I later filled with 5 minute epoxy... I think I spent $8, and it triggers off a tiny 32 pitch RC truck spur gear to ~12K RPM+
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
foreverska
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:24 am

Re: Pulley Options thick enough for Hall sensor magnets?

Post by foreverska »

Piledriver wrote:There are several off the shelf hall sensor setups available, like Marios' hidden setup.
Mario's hidden setup is a VR. It's hard to find an off the shelf hall that fits behind the pully on the T1 engines. I tried awhile back. If you ever find one notify me.

The T4 kit has a hall but it also has a longer snout than the VR.
User avatar
Piledriver
Moderator
Posts: 22520
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am

Re: Pulley Options thick enough for Hall sensor magnets?

Post by Piledriver »

I dug up the spare sensor seyup I made, it is tiny, cheap/easy to make, and works awesome.
Is also a fully automotive temp. grade sensor, and is very likely what is actually inside many if not most OEM sensors.
The sensor body is bent flat against the leads and the working end points out, this will slide into a 5/16" ID tube.

In either 3/8" tube form or an encapsulated popsicle format (default) it could be made to fit ~anywhere.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
Bruce.m
Posts: 803
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 1:44 pm

Re: Pulley Options thick enough for Hall sensor magnets?

Post by Bruce.m »

What are the surface mount components, values & solder points?
Thanks.
User avatar
Piledriver
Moderator
Posts: 22520
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 12:01 am

Re: Pulley Options thick enough for Hall sensor magnets?

Post by Piledriver »

Bruce.m wrote:What are the surface mount components, values & solder points?
Thanks.
I simply used the "recommended circuit" in the ATS667 datasheet, with a pullup resistor appropriate for the intended voltage.
~5K seems to work for 5v or 12v if feeding an LM1813 via a 1uF capacitor to provide a faux VR signal, an opto input must be setup for the desired voltage as it lacks an AGC circuit as the VR chips require.

I chose the component physical sizes to straddle legs where needed.
(smd parts come in numerous physical sizes from ~fly poop to pretty chunky, like the cap I used that straddles (but does not connect to) the 2 middle legs)

The ATS667 will actually run on 3.3 to 30v IIRC.

About the only issue I ran into is you must be careful to reflow the solder joints to remove any stress if you have to bend the legs after assembly, lest the tinned area pops off and you effectively break the smd component.

It all gets embedded in 5 minute epoxy in the end, oil/waterproof and highly mechanical shock resistant.

From a reliability standpoint, connecting all the components with tiny wires might be better, then embed the ratsnest in epoxy.
(one could also make a tiny little PCB for the circuit, but doing it in 3D is usually far more compact)
Addendum to Newtons first law:
zero vehicles on jackstands, square gets a fresh 090 and 1911, cabby gets a blower.
EZ3.6 Vanagon after that.(mounted, needs everything finished) then Creamsicle.
Post Reply