Ride height vs Traction

Do you like to go fast? Well get out of that stocker and build a hipo motor for your VW. Come here to talk with others who like to drive fast.

Moderator: Tom Notch

Post Reply
User avatar
66NCVW
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2015 2:47 pm

Ride height vs Traction

Post by 66NCVW » Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:25 pm

My project 66 is at stock height at the moment. I'm putting a set of m&h's on it for street duty and want to bring the back end down a little bit. I don't have the time/extra cash just this second to do the RLR tranny raise so my question is how far can I come down in the rear before the axle geometry no longer works for launching/drag racing? It's a 66 short axle bug.

Bruce2
Posts: 6792
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2001 3:01 am

Re: Ride height vs Traction

Post by Bruce2 » Mon Jan 15, 2018 4:51 am

There is no answer for that.
As you lower a swing axle car, negative camber gets greater as you probably know. At some point your tire's contact patch is reduced enough so that you don't get enough traction on the line. The amount of traction you need depends on how much hp you make.

User avatar
Chip Birks
Posts: 2574
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 7:59 pm
Location: Pleasant Grove, Utah

Re: Ride height vs Traction

Post by Chip Birks » Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:15 am

66NCVW wrote:
Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:25 pm
My project 66 is at stock height at the moment. I'm putting a set of m&h's on it for street duty and want to bring the back end down a little bit. I don't have the time/extra cash just this second to do the RLR tranny raise so my question is how far can I come down in the rear before the axle geometry no longer works for launching/drag racing? It's a 66 short axle bug.
I brought the rear of my 60 down a few inches over its 215/65 15s. Its not slammed, but does tuck the tire nicely, definitely sits with some camber. I also run 29mm torsions in the rear. The car has 60ft'd in the 1.60 range, doesn't spin if I launch at 5500rpm with a few psi boost, rolling on M&H 6" slicks. It has clicked off an easy 12.1 in that configuration, making way more power than 12.1s require, but fighting other issues. I'm sure if i spent some time trying to tune the suspension, it would go easy 1.5s, but I just don't really care. The car is wicked fast and feels stable on the street, where it spends 99% of its time.

User avatar
66NCVW
Posts: 73
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2015 2:47 pm

Re: Ride height vs Traction

Post by 66NCVW » Mon Jan 15, 2018 1:06 pm

Chip Birks wrote:
Mon Jan 15, 2018 7:15 am
66NCVW wrote:
Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:25 pm
My project 66 is at stock height at the moment. I'm putting a set of m&h's on it for street duty and want to bring the back end down a little bit. I don't have the time/extra cash just this second to do the RLR tranny raise so my question is how far can I come down in the rear before the axle geometry no longer works for launching/drag racing? It's a 66 short axle bug.
I brought the rear of my 60 down a few inches over its 215/65 15s. Its not slammed, but does tuck the tire nicely, definitely sits with some camber. I also run 29mm torsions in the rear. The car has 60ft'd in the 1.60 range, doesn't spin if I launch at 5500rpm with a few psi boost, rolling on M&H 6" slicks. It has clicked off an easy 12.1 in that configuration, making way more power than 12.1s require, but fighting other issues. I'm sure if i spent some time trying to tune the suspension, it would go easy 1.5s, but I just don't really care. The car is wicked fast and feels stable on the street, where it spends 99% of its time.

Perfect! Thats what I was looking for. Thanks Chip! One more question, what size wheels/offset were you running at that time?

User avatar
Chip Birks
Posts: 2574
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 7:59 pm
Location: Pleasant Grove, Utah

Re: Ride height vs Traction

Post by Chip Birks » Mon Jan 15, 2018 11:02 pm

I currently run 5.5" gas burners from cip1. Not sure on the offset. 3.5 or 4" i think. I have 1/4" spacers behind the rears as the inside of the tire was touching the body to pan mount occasionally. 3" beam with dropped spindles and disks.

I've also run ERCO Star cut outs, 0 offset 3.5" fronts and 6" rears, not sure on the offset, probably 3.5.

Post Reply